This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record
[
https://lawrecord.com
]
Export date: Thu Mar 28 9:04:51 2024 / +0000 GMT
42 Rutgers L. Rec. 110 (2015) | WestLaw | LexisNexis | PDF
In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations' employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.
Post date: 2015-02-22 15:02:30
Post date GMT: 2015-02-22 22:02:30
Post modified date: 2015-03-19 12:44:25
Post modified date GMT: 2015-03-19 19:44:25
Powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin. MS Word saving format developed by gVectors Team www.gVectors.com