The Rutgers Law Record
https://lawrecord.com/2015/02/22/the-aftermath-of-hobby-lobby-hsas-and-hras-as-the-least-restrictive-means/
Export date: Fri Apr 26 15:08:12 2024 / +0000 GMT

The Aftermath of Hobby Lobby: HSAs and HRAs as the Least Restrictive Means


42 Rutgers L. Rec. 110 (2015) | WestLaw 1 | LexisNexis 2 | PDF 3

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations' employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.

View the entire article --> 4
Links:
  1. http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?cite=42+Rut gers+L.+Rec.+110&FindType=F&ForceAction=Y&SV=Full& RS=ITK3.0&VR=1.0
  2. http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGIN ATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=42 Rutgers L. Rec. 110
  3. http://lawrecord.com/files/42_Rutgers_L_Rec_110.pd f
  4. http://lawrecord.com/files/42_Rutgers_L_Rec_110.pd f
Post date: 2015-02-22 15:02:30
Post date GMT: 2015-02-22 22:02:30

Post modified date: 2015-03-19 12:44:25
Post modified date GMT: 2015-03-19 19:44:25

Export date: Fri Apr 26 15:08:12 2024 / +0000 GMT
This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ https://lawrecord.com ]
Export of Post and Page has been powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin from www.ProfProjects.com