<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rutgers Law Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawrecord.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawrecord.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:10:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Special Relationship Bystander Test: A Rational Alternative to the Closely Related Requirement of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress for Bystanders</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/26/special-relationship-bystander-test-a-rational-alternative-to-the-closely-related-requirement-of-negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-for-bystanders/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/26/special-relationship-bystander-test-a-rational-alternative-to-the-closely-related-requirement-of-negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-for-bystanders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin E. Flora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bystander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligent infliction of emotional distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An engaged couple was crossing Washington Street in downtown Indianapolis, Indiana, en route to the county clerk’s office to apply for a marriage license. The bride-to-be noticed a tractor-trailer bearing down on her and her fiancé. Realizing that the truck &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/26/special-relationship-bystander-test-a-rational-alternative-to-the-closely-related-requirement-of-negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-for-bystanders/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/26/special-relationship-bystander-test-a-rational-alternative-to-the-closely-related-requirement-of-negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-for-bystanders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ready, Aim, Fire: Employing Open Records Acts As Another Weapon Against Public Law School Clinics</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/19/ready-aim-fire-employing-open-records-acts-as-another-weapon-against-public-law-school-clinics/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/19/ready-aim-fire-employing-open-records-acts-as-another-weapon-against-public-law-school-clinics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Dearborn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Information is the oxygen of democracy.” Indeed, transparency in government is the essence of any democratic system &#8211; without it, corruption is free to thrive in secrecy. Therefore, it is essential to provide the citizenry with freedom of information as &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/19/ready-aim-fire-employing-open-records-acts-as-another-weapon-against-public-law-school-clinics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2012/01/19/ready-aim-fire-employing-open-records-acts-as-another-weapon-against-public-law-school-clinics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registration Open for Fall Symposium 2011 &#8211; No Child Left Behind, Ten Years Later</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/10/29/registration-open-for-fall-symposium-2011-no-child-left-behind-ten-years-later/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/10/29/registration-open-for-fall-symposium-2011-no-child-left-behind-ten-years-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Registration for the Fall 2011 Symposium is open. On November 10th, 2011, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., The Rutgers Law Record, BarBri and The Rutgers Institute for Professional Education will host a symposium on the No Child Left Behind &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/10/29/registration-open-for-fall-symposium-2011-no-child-left-behind-ten-years-later/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/10/29/registration-open-for-fall-symposium-2011-no-child-left-behind-ten-years-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting to the Core: Rewriting the No Child Left Behind Act for the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/31/getting-to-the-core-rewriting-the-no-child-left-behind-act-for-the-21st-century/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/31/getting-to-the-core-rewriting-the-no-child-left-behind-act-for-the-21st-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diana Pullin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adequate Yearly Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elementary and Secondary Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any consideration of the next generation of law-based education reform must address the dual goals of insuring public accountability for all schools to educate all students, as well as insuring every child’s individual opportunity to learn meaningful content. The impending &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/31/getting-to-the-core-rewriting-the-no-child-left-behind-act-for-the-21st-century/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/31/getting-to-the-core-rewriting-the-no-child-left-behind-act-for-the-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case of Casey Anthony: Defending the American Jury System</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/11/the-case-of-casey-anthony-defending-the-american-jury-system/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/11/the-case-of-casey-anthony-defending-the-american-jury-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Dearborn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casey Anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caylee Anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 5, 2011, after only eleven hours of deliberation and no request to review evidence, a twelve-person jury found twenty-five year old Casey Anthony not guilty of murdering her two year old daughter, Caylee.1 The two-year old had been &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/11/the-case-of-casey-anthony-defending-the-american-jury-system/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/11/the-case-of-casey-anthony-defending-the-american-jury-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Defendant Cases: When the Death Penalty is Imposed on the Less Culpable Offender</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/01/multiple-defendant-cases-when-the-death-penalty-is-imposed-on-the-less-culpable-offender/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/01/multiple-defendant-cases-when-the-death-penalty-is-imposed-on-the-less-culpable-offender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ursula Bentele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When more than one person is involved in a crime resulting in death, in most jurisdictions the felony murder doctrine operates to render everyone equally responsible for murder. Lay people often find it surprising, and somewhat disturbing, that the “lookout” &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/01/multiple-defendant-cases-when-the-death-penalty-is-imposed-on-the-less-culpable-offender/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/08/01/multiple-defendant-cases-when-the-death-penalty-is-imposed-on-the-less-culpable-offender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Using Persons” and the Justification of Punishment</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/%e2%80%9cusing-persons%e2%80%9d-and-the-justification-of-punishment/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/%e2%80%9cusing-persons%e2%80%9d-and-the-justification-of-punishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dolinko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retributive justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short essay that follows has a very modest ambition. I want to explain why I have difficulty understanding a common motif in discussions of the moral status of criminal punishment. The goal is to stimulate other, more acute scholars &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/%e2%80%9cusing-persons%e2%80%9d-and-the-justification-of-punishment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/%e2%80%9cusing-persons%e2%80%9d-and-the-justification-of-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vernor v. Autodesk: An Erosion of First Sale Rights</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/vernor-v-autodesk-an-erosion-of-first-sale-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/vernor-v-autodesk-an-erosion-of-first-sale-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David A. Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Sale Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first-sale doctrine is a long-standing exception to the exclusive right to distribution granted under copyright law. It provides that a copyright holder, after the initial sale of a copy of a work, has no right to control any downstream &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/vernor-v-autodesk-an-erosion-of-first-sale-rights/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/vernor-v-autodesk-an-erosion-of-first-sale-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearing and Trade Execution Requirements for OTC Derivatives Swaps Under the Frank- Dodd Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/clearing-and-trade-execution-requirements-for-otc-derivatives-swaps-under-the-frank-dodd-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/clearing-and-trade-execution-requirements-for-otc-derivatives-swaps-under-the-frank-dodd-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Willa E. Gibson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brokerages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities and Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article examines Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act entitled the “Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010” (the “Act”). The Act provides a comprehensive regulatory framework for swap transactions that designates the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/clearing-and-trade-execution-requirements-for-otc-derivatives-swaps-under-the-frank-dodd-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/clearing-and-trade-execution-requirements-for-otc-derivatives-swaps-under-the-frank-dodd-wall-street-reform-and-consumer-protection-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Governance and the Role of Public and Private Monitoring of Labor Conditions: Sweatshops and China Social Compliance for Textile and Apparel Industry/CSC9000T</title>
		<link>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/new-governance-and-the-role-of-public-and-private-monitoring-of-labor-conditions-sweatshops-and-china-social-compliance-for-textile-and-apparel-industrycsc9000t/</link>
		<comments>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/new-governance-and-the-role-of-public-and-private-monitoring-of-labor-conditions-sweatshops-and-china-social-compliance-for-textile-and-apparel-industrycsc9000t/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Paul Harpur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweatshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective regulation has three essential components. First, the law must develop standards; second, there must be sufficient monitoring of compliance to detect non-compliance; and third, there must be some form of motivation to avoid non-compliance. The growth in international trade &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/new-governance-and-the-role-of-public-and-private-monitoring-of-labor-conditions-sweatshops-and-china-social-compliance-for-textile-and-apparel-industrycsc9000t/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawrecord.com/2011/06/07/new-governance-and-the-role-of-public-and-private-monitoring-of-labor-conditions-sweatshops-and-china-social-compliance-for-textile-and-apparel-industrycsc9000t/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  lawrecord.com/feed/ ) in 1.20826 seconds, on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:38 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:38 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  lawrecord.com/feed/ ) in 0.00154 seconds, on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:29 pm UTC. -->
