<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Rutgers Law Record</title>
	<link>https://lawrecord.com</link>
	<description>The First Digital Law Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Sun Apr 26 22:59:40 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett: Into The Abyss Between Judicial Process and Collectively Bargained Agreements to Arbitrate Individual Statutory Claims</title>
			<link>http://lawrecord.com/?p=451</link>
			<pubDate>Sun Apr 26 22:59:40 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawrecord.com/?p=451</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #666666;">38 Rutgers L. Rec. 173 (2011)</span> | <a href="http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?cite=38+Rutgers+L.+Rec.+173&FindType=F&ForceAction=Y&SV=Full&RS=ITK3.0&VR=1.0" target=_new title="Open In WestLaw">WestLaw</a> | <a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=38 Rutgers L. Rec. 173" target=_new title="Open In LexisNexis">LexisNexis</a> | <a href="http://lawrecord.com/files/38_Rutgers_L_Rec_173.pdf" target=_new>PDF</a></span>
On April 1st, 2009 a bitterly divided United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5-4, turned the world of labor arbitration on its head. The Court's opinion in <em>14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett</em> overturned 35 years of jurisprudence, grounded in <em>Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.</em> dictum, by establishing that collectively bargained clauses expressly authorizing the arbitration of statutory claims are enforceable, either compelling arbitration or precluding the grant of an award in a judicial action. Grounding their decision, in part, on the prominent “Steelworkers Trilogy” case <em>United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel</em>, the Court in <em>Pyett</em> narrowed the <em>Gardner-Denver</em> Court's view on whether a union can waive a member's right to seek judicial determination of a statutory right.

<a href="http://lawrecord.com/files/38_Rutgers_L_Rec_173.pdf" target="_blank">View the entire article --&gt;</a>]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>451</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2011-04-22 10:56:39</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2011-04-22 17:56:39</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
