https://lawrecord.com The First Digital Law Journal Sun Apr 26 21:17:07 2026 / +0000 GMT Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] http://lawrecord.com/?p=724 Sun Apr 26 21:17:07 2026 / +0000 GMT http://lawrecord.com/?p=724 39 Rutgers L. Rec. 75 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis | PDF In a recent New York Times op-ed piece, Stanford Law Professor Jeffrey Fisher predicted the outcome of Williams v. Illinois, a case pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. Professor Fisher has argued that “a logical application of the law produces an easy answer” in Williams. The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution's Sixth Amendment requires all persons who are “witnesses against” a criminal defendant, including lab analysts whose reports are not being offered into evidence at trial, to testify in court. We should trust Professor Fisher's analysis of Williams. After all, his argument in Crawford v. Washington was the genesis for the string of United States Supreme Court cases that give criminal defendants expanded rights under the Confrontation Clause. View the entire article -->]]> 724 2012-03-23 18:41:03 2012-03-24 01:41:03