This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ https://lawrecord.com ]

Export date:Tue Apr 16 11:11:40 2024 / +0000 GMT

___________________________________________________


Title: Mandate or Myth: Is there a 'Heightened Standard' for Redevelopment Area Designations, and if so, From Where Does it Come?

---------------------------------------------------


39 Rutgers L. Rec. 116 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis | PDF
In 2012, New Jersey's Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL) governing the use of eminent domain for redevelopment will turn twenty years old. In its first ten years, LRHL enabled virtually unchecked exercises of local government authority to declare “areas in need of redevelopment.” In the last ten years, however, a combination of factors—ranging from pushback against overzealous condemnations to doubts about the effectiveness of redevelopment—has led the judiciary to more strictly interpret the statute and its constitutional foundations. Ultimately, municipal use of the LRHL has become less unfettered. Generally speaking, this has been appropriate both legally and policy-wise.

View the entire article -->

---------------------------------------------------


Images: 

---------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------


Post date: 2012-05-18 19:17:20

Post date GMT: 2012-05-19 02:17:20

Post modified date: 2012-05-18 19:17:20

Post modified date GMT: 2012-05-19 02:17:20



____________________________________________________________________________________________


Export of Post and Page as text file has been powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin from www.gconverters.com