The Rutgers Law Record
Export date: Mon Jul 13 17:51:13 2020 / +0000 GMT

The Government's Power to Block on Twitter: A First Amendment Analysis

46 Rutgers L. Rec. 161 (2019) | WestLaw 1 | LexisNexis 2 | PDF 3

Today, the vast exchange of political ideas occurs on forums like Twitter and Facebook. When scrolling on social media, the public has become “entitled to believe [] that they are viewing something of a representative cross-section” between the public's reactions and the government's reaction to their pronouncements. A government official's social media account is used as a means to communicate with the public, thereby creating an appearance of a public forum. Electronic communication of this nature is so popular because it is “inexpensive,” “fast,” and “reaches a wide audience.” However, this new way to communicate comes with increased constitutional responsibilities.

View the entire article --> 4
  1. gers+L.+Rec.+161&FindType=F&ForceAction=Y&SV=Full& RS=ITK3.0&VR=1.0
  2. ATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=46 Rutgers L. Rec. 161
  3. f
  4. f
Post date: 2019-05-22 18:48:40
Post date GMT: 2019-05-23 01:48:40

Post modified date: 2019-05-22 18:48:40
Post modified date GMT: 2019-05-23 01:48:40

Export date: Mon Jul 13 17:51:13 2020 / +0000 GMT
This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ ]
Export of Post and Page has been powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin from