This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ ]
Export date: Fri Aug 14 13:15:01 2020 / +0000 GMT

Of Two Evils, Choose Neither. The Bifurcated Church Plan Election.

47 Rutgers L. Rec. 104 (2019) | WestLaw | LexisNexis | PDF

Millions of Americans get their healthcare through health plans that are provided by a religious employer. Nearly all of these health plans invoke “church plan” status as a means to legally exclude coverage of medically-approved procedures they deem morally-objectionable. The 2017 Supreme Court holding in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton extends church plan protections to plans covering many more millions of employees of religiously-affiliated entities. However, religious employers that exclude these procedures based on church plan status risk violating state law, and can make the plan a target for costly employee lawsuits.

View the entire article -->



Post date: 2020-02-11 07:27:10
Post date GMT: 2020-02-11 14:27:10
Post modified date: 2020-02-11 07:27:10
Post modified date GMT: 2020-02-11 14:27:10

Powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin. MS Word saving format developed by gVectors Team