The Rutgers Law Record
Export date: Sat Jul 13 14:02:08 2024 / +0000 GMT

Of Two Evils, Choose Neither. The Bifurcated Church Plan Election.

47 Rutgers L. Rec. 104 (2019) | WestLaw 1 | LexisNexis 2 | PDF 3

Millions of Americans get their healthcare through health plans that are provided by a religious employer. Nearly all of these health plans invoke “church plan” status as a means to legally exclude coverage of medically-approved procedures they deem morally-objectionable. The 2017 Supreme Court holding in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton extends church plan protections to plans covering many more millions of employees of religiously-affiliated entities. However, religious employers that exclude these procedures based on church plan status risk violating state law, and can make the plan a target for costly employee lawsuits.

View the entire article --> 4
  1. gers+L.+Rec.+104&FindType=F&ForceAction=Y&SV=Full& RS=ITK3.0&VR=1.0
  2. ATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=47 Rutgers L. Rec. 104
  3. f
  4. f
Post date: 2020-02-11 07:27:10
Post date GMT: 2020-02-11 14:27:10

Post modified date: 2020-02-11 07:27:10
Post modified date GMT: 2020-02-11 14:27:10

Export date: Sat Jul 13 14:02:08 2024 / +0000 GMT
This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ ]
Export of Post and Page has been powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin from