<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Rutgers Law Record</title>
	<link>https://lawrecord.com</link>
	<description>The First Digital Law Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Sun Apr 26 22:46:29 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>The Future of LGBTQ+ Equality After Obergefell and Bostock</title>
			<link>https://lawrecord.com/?p=1901</link>
			<pubDate>Sun Apr 26 22:46:29 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lawrecord.com/?p=1901</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #666666;">49 Rutgers L. Rec. 60 (2021)</span> | <a href="http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?cite=49+Rutgers+L.+Rec.+60&FindType=F&ForceAction=Y&SV=Full&RS=ITK3.0&VR=1.0" target=_new title="Open In WestLaw">WestLaw</a> | <a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=49 Rutgers L. Rec. 60" target=_new title="Open In LexisNexis">LexisNexis</a> | <a href="http://lawrecord.com/files/49_Rutgers_L_Rec_60.pdf" target=_new>PDF</a></span></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The Supreme Court's decisions in&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Bostock v. Clayton County</em>&nbsp;are justly regarded as landmark decisions in American jurisprudence and, more importantly, significant milestones in the history of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (“LGBTQ+”) Americans. However, these important decisions are not the end of the movement for LGBTQ+ equality, and many more obstacles remain for the LGBTQ+ community.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>This article will begin with an overview of the legal history of sexual orientation and gender identity in the United States; the recognition of and enactment of constitutional and civil rights by courts and legislatures; and the discrimination performed by each. The next part is an overview of the future of sexual orientation and gender identity law, including the Equality Act and other legal issues.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The thesis of this article is to state the urgent need for passage of the Equality Act and the introduction and passage of other legal devices that will relieve the undue burdens still faced by ordinary LGBTQ+ Americans after the Supreme Court's decisions in&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Bostock v. Clayton County</em>.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong><a href="http://lawrecord.com/files/Manuel, THE FUTURE OF LGBTQ EQUALITY AFTER OBERGEFELL AND BOSTOCK.pdf" data-type="URL" data-id="http://lawrecord.com/files/Manuel, THE FUTURE OF LGBTQ EQUALITY AFTER OBERGEFELL AND BOSTOCK.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">View the entire article</a></strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>1901</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2021-12-19 21:39:57</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2021-12-20 04:39:57</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
