This page was exported from The Rutgers Law Record [ https://lawrecord.com ] Export date:Tue Apr 23 18:56:31 2024 / +0000 GMT ___________________________________________________ Title: Volume 39 --------------------------------------------------- Education LawGetting to the Core: Rewriting the No Child Left Behind Act for the 21st CenturyDiana Pullin39 Rutgers L. Rec. 1 (2011) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Ready, Aim, Fire: Employing Open Records Acts As Another Weapon Against Public Law School ClinicsJennifer Dearborn39 Rutgers L. Rec. 16 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis An Analysis of the Constitutionality of Arizona's Ethic Studies LawPreston C. Green, III, David Brown and Sara Ney39 Rutgers L. Rec. 86 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Special Education for a Special Population: Why Federal Special Education Law Must Be Reformed for Autistic ChildrenLaura C. Hoffman39 Rutgers L. Rec. 128 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Tort LawSpecial Relationship Bystander Test: A Rational Alternative to the Closely Related Requirement of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress for BystandersColin E. Flora39 Rutgers L. Rec. 28 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis ImmigrationPadilla v. Kentucky's Inapplicability to Undocumented and Non-Immigrant VisitorsCésar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández39 Rutgers L. Rec. 47 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis EvidenceNo Expertise Required: How Washington D.C. Has Erred in Expanding Its Expert Testimony RequirementColin Miller39 Rutgers L. Rec. 55 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Don't Blame Crawford or Bryant: the Confrontation Clause Mess is All Davis's FaultDeborah Ahrens and John Mitchell39 Rutgers L. Rec. 104 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Criminal LawThe Right to Confront Witnesses, but not Necessarily at Trial: Predicting a Judge-focused Remedy in Williams v. IllinoisScott A. Anderson39 Rutgers L. Rec. 75 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Neuroscience, Brain Damage, and the Criminal Defendant: Who Does It Help and Where in the Criminal Proceeding Is It Most Relevant?Adam Lamparello39 Rutgers L. Rec. 161 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Housing LawMandate or Myth: Is There a 'Heightened Standard' for Redevelopment Area Designations, and if so, From Where Does It Come?Brian N. Biglin39 Rutgers L. Rec. 116 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis Older Issues → --------------------------------------------------- Images: --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Post date: 2012-10-09 11:00:40 Post date GMT: 2012-10-09 18:00:40 Post modified date: 2012-10-16 21:08:04 Post modified date GMT: 2012-10-17 04:08:04 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Export of Post and Page as text file has been powered by [ Universal Post Manager ] plugin from www.gconverters.com