Mandate or Myth: Is there a ‘Heightened Standard’ for Redevelopment Area Designations, and if so, From Where Does it Come?

39 Rutgers L. Rec. 116 (2012) | WestLaw | LexisNexis | PDF
In 2012, New Jersey’s Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL) governing the use of eminent domain for redevelopment will turn twenty years old. In its first ten years, LRHL enabled virtually unchecked exercises of local government authority to declare “areas in need of redevelopment.” In the last ten years, however, a combination of factors—ranging from pushback against overzealous condemnations to doubts about the effectiveness of redevelopment—has led the judiciary to more strictly interpret the statute and its constitutional foundations. Ultimately, municipal use of the LRHL has become less unfettered. Generally speaking, this has been appropriate both legally and policy-wise.

View the entire article –>

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , by Brian N. Biglin. Bookmark the permalink.

About Brian N. Biglin

Associate, Sills Cummis & Gross, P.C., Newark. J.D., Cum Laude, 2011, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, School of Law in Newark. A.B., Economics, University of Michigan, 2008. Senior Articles Editor, Rutgers Law Review 2010-2011. The author gratefully acknowledges Robert Goldsmith, Esq., Adjunct Professor of Law, Rutgers School of Law, for his assistance in developing the topics covered in this paper.

Comments are closed.